Hints and tips:
Related Special Reports
...The US Supreme Court on Thursday wrestled with how to define the scope of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution as Donald Trump fights charges of interfering in the 2020 election....
...The appeal stems from a unanimous ruling handed down earlier this month by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that barred Trump from using presidential immunity as a shield against...
...“Without presidential immunity, a president will not be able to properly function, or make decisions, in the best interest of the United States of America.”...
...by a ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, dismissing Donald Trump’s claim to legal immunity from criminal prosecution....
...But the Supreme Court denied that request, and the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia took up the case, unanimously ruling against Trump....
...Last week, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled unanimously that he is not....
...Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney....
...He subsequently appealed against this decision to an intermediate appeals court, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit, and asked that all proceedings related to the case be put on...
...the state of Florida was blocked....
...For the first time in history, the attack was incited by a sitting president of the United States to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power.”...
...In a unanimous decision handed down on Tuesday, the three-judge panel for the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said he was not entitled to immunity because he was no longer president...
...Donald Trump: The US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments to determine whether former president Donald Trump is immune from criminal charges for actions taken while in the White House....
...At the request of Trump’s legal team, the court agreed to expedite his appeal against a ruling of the Colorado Supreme Court that struck him off the state’s primary ballot....
...The state supreme court on Tuesday ruled that an 1864 ban on all abortions, except those aimed at saving a woman’s life, is now enforceable....
...A federal ban on sports betting was overturned by the US Supreme Court in 2018, paving the way for its legalisation in 38 US states and the District of Columbia. It remains prohibited in California....
...While consumer sports betting is now legal in 38 states and the District of Columbia, professional leagues largely prohibit players and personnel from wagering, particularly on their own sports....
...a conservative Supreme Court could be sympathetic to their claims....
...Drain, the only bankruptcy judge sitting in the White Plains Division of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York....
...That champerty works against litigious investors was proved in 1998, when Peru successfully used a champerty defence against Elliott Associates in the district court, although it was reversed on appeal....
...The Supreme Court’s move comes just two days after Trump petitioned the court to overturn a decision by Colorado’s state supreme court to ban him from the primary ballot there....
...The US vice-president was in Arizona three days after the state’s supreme court upheld a 160-year-old law banning nearly all abortions, with no exceptions for victims of rape and incest....
...Even if he returns to the White House he would not be able to pardon himself, because the case is in a state court....
...“The court battle to open iOS to competing stores and payments is lost in the United States,” Epic Games chief executive Tim Sweeney wrote on social media platform X after the Supreme Court’s order on Tuesday...
...“The whole corner-crossing stuff is so up-in-the-air in the state.” If corner crossing ever made it to the state Supreme Court, one surmised, it would be legalised....
...Trump’s lawyers claimed in their petition to the US Supreme Court that the Colorado judges had “misinterpreted and misapplied the text” of the constitution, and said Congress, not state courts, should decide...
International Edition