Hints and tips:
...(FT) ‘Muppets v Sharks’ Small-time retail investors who ploughed money into the oil market thinking they’d spotted an opportunity to make money as prices crashed were left holding the bag, so to speak,...
...(FT) Coaching v commanding Andrew Hill recounts how industrial group Linde won over sceptical staff in 2017 with a safety drive based on “active listening”....
...(Incidentally, for my money, Cronenberg’s scuffed aesthetic has dated at least a little better than the gleaming postmodernism of Neo and Trinity et al.)...
...There’s not much precedent to support the idea that Shina et al can walk away based on a MAC clause: WPP was forced against its will to buy Tempus in 2001, Guy Hands couldn’t scrap a bid for East Surrey...
...(FT, Al Jazeera) Keep up with the important business, economic and political stories in the coming days with the FT’s Week Ahead. Click to subscribe here....
...Greene herself steers clear of criticising Amazon but she angrily sums up the challenge from Whistl et al like this: “This is not the kind of competition that drives efficiency....
...The group’s explanation is that the deals have been struck between the bankers and a Georgia-registered banking subsidiary. Mr Gilauri et al have normal contracts with the UK-based holding company....
...We don’t even particularly associate our big moments with great photographs: Eisenstaedt’s “V-J Day in Times Square” has no London equivalent....
...Mr Gillett was ready to accept DIC’s offer of more than £80m for 98 per cent of his half-stake, with the remainder of his stake going to Mr Hicks to give him a 51 per cent holding....
...al v....
International Edition