Hints and tips:
...Mr Lorenzo was promoting a debenture offering in Waste2Energy Holdings Inc — a now-bankrupt company which was claiming it had technology that converted waste into clean energy....
...The status of the workers who provide the services offered by so-called gig economy companies such as Uber has been a point of contention for many years....
...Thanks to a series of court rulings since the mid-2000s, such as eBay v MercExchange in 2007, Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories in 2012 and Alice Corp v CLS Bank in 2014, and the subsequent...
...A 2009 Supreme Court case involving prescription drug labels, Wyeth v Levine, greenlighted state laws that are stricter than federal laws....
...once provided services to the bank through Lehman Brothers Ltd and are still owed money....
...In the Salman case, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its 1983 ruling in Dirks v SEC, which held that when an insider gives trading information to a relative or friend, it is effectively the same as if the insider...
...Mr Cooperman has also said that the US Attorney in New Jersey’s investigation of him and his firm is on hold, “pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Salman v United States”....
...Defence lawyers hinge their argument on a leading 1983 Supreme Court decision called Dirks v. SEC....
...Defence lawyers argued a leading 1983 Supreme Court decision called Dirks v. SEC was the guiding principle....
...The great weakness of the Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay v....
...He went on to criticise the “lack of basic functionality like multi-tasking in the operating system” of the iPhone as he described a more sophisticated messaging service in 2.2 than Apple’s push notifications...
...Altria, the largest US tobacco company, added 3.3 per cent to $20.34 after the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal filed by the Obama administration against the tobacco industry....
...Will the US Supreme Court further cut back on the scope of patent protection?...
...Shareholder primacy, the idea that a corporation’s role is to maximise shareholder wealth above all else, has its roots in a 1919 Michigan Supreme Court case, Dodge v. Ford Motor Co....
...The right has existed in US state common law since a 1918 case called International New Services v. Associated Press....
...In a friend-of-the-court brief, the Investment Company Institute, the national association of US investment companies, urged the court to uphold the Gartenberg standard....
...One key signpost along the way is the 2006 Supreme court decision in Ebay v....
...But many agree with the Supreme Court of the United States in Ebay v....
...Its decision earlier this year, for example, in Quanta Computer Inc v LG Electronics, presented its own procedural tangles, but the bottom line was that it reached the exact opposite result....
...The notorious 2006 Supreme Court decision in Ebay v MercExchange started the ball rolling by undermining the ability of private patentees to gain injunctive relief as a matter of course for patent infringements...
...The decision of the ITC puts it on a collision course with the recent developments in domestic US patent law since the US Supreme Court’s enigmatic 2006 decision in Ebay v MercExchange, which cast grave...
...This past month, in Twombly v Bell Atlantic, the plaintiffs had alleged that all of the Regional Bell Operating Companies had conspired to divide markets by agreeing not to enter each other’s primary territory...
...The ruling is the latest Supreme Court decision protecting US companies from securities lawsuits....
...In Stoneridge Investment Partners v Scientific Atlanta , the court is considering whether investors can recover from firms – including accountants, lawyers and bankers – that help a public company commit...
...Twombly v. Bell Atlantic, now before the US Supreme Court, offers a powerful object lesson of the dangers of that dual approach....
International Edition