Hints and tips:
...Supreme Court scepticism of affirmative action in college admissions The US Supreme Court’s conservative majority yesterday expressed scepticism over universities’ authority to consider race as a factor...
...“Justice Thomas was the sole member of the Supreme Court who would have allowed records from Trump, Meadows, et al to be withheld from House Jan 6 Committee,” Kaine said on Twitter....
...Now see the many state attorneys-general (acolytes, no doubt of Alito et. al.) who want to sanction corporations that adopt ESG....
...(And thanks to our very own Supreme Court, we can even pray in the newsroom if you like!)...
...As Lord David Pannick QC et al observed in a letter to the Times this week the doctrine of necessity requires “grave and imminent peril” to which the state in question has not contributed....
...He notes they donated a print to the US Supreme Court when Ruth Bader Ginsberg was in bad health....
...Trump et al v....
...But the Reserve Bank of India’s interdiction was overturned by a Supreme Court decision in March....
...In 2000, Al Gore decided to concede after the Supreme Court halted the re-count in Florida. I can't predict whether this race will go further....
...Twenty years ago, titans of the legal industry faced off before the US Supreme Court over the results of a presidential election....
...US appeals court judge Laurence Silberman has urged the Supreme Court to rethink the landmark 1964 decision that protects American media from most libel claims....
...Its ruling was subsequently upheld by the Swiss Supreme Court and endorsed by other courts elsewhere....
...It is set to be heard by the Supreme Court in early November....
...For example, in a 2010 opinion (Chevron Corp v Steven Donziger, et al) handed down from the US district court in Manhattan, the judge wrote that the “evidence at trial established that Donziger, a New York...
...And in Clinton v Jones, a unanimous court ruled that the president could face civil lawsuits for non-official actions that occurred before he took office. How might the Supreme Court rule?...
...The case, Brown et al. vs USA Taekwondo et al., deals with sexual abuse suffered by three young former Olympic hopefuls in taekwondo, whose coach was convicted and sent to prison in 2015....
...The power of the American courts to check both Congress and the president has been accepted since at least 1803 when, in Marbury v Madison, the Supreme Court declared that justices could throw out laws that...
...From August 14, Nichols’s company will present Henry V and The Merry Wives of Windsor....
...The case may eventually reach the Supreme Court, analysts said. But DAPL’s fate lies in the hands of the American public....
...24 September 2019 R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent) Cherry and others (Respondents) v Advocate General for Scotland (Appellant) (Scotland) On appeals from:...
...The test is founded on a 1983 decision by the Supreme Court in Dirks v SEC, where the justices cleared a securities analyst because he had not been motivated by a personal benefit when he discussed information...
...There’s not much precedent to support the idea that Shina et al can walk away based on a MAC clause: WPP was forced against its will to buy Tempus in 2001, Guy Hands couldn’t scrap a bid for East Surrey...
...Court....
...In August, the supreme court upheld a stay on the investigation; nevertheless, his file remains open. He would like to see more of his peers challenge Hasina’s regime....
...Along with the powerhouses of LVMH, Kering et al, niche indie designers are also carving out an aesthetic mixing west and east in a way that is both credible and commercially viable....
International Edition