Hints and tips:
Related Special Reports
...Lawyers whose clients have received the documents believe the Home Office is rescinding existing “notices of intent to remove” because they were issued when the Supreme Court had ruled that the country was...
...In the coming months, the inquiry will hear testimony from several former general counsel at the Post Office, each of whom will give evidence against the backdrop of a debate about whether the role of an...
...The special counsel overseeing the US Department of Justice’s cases against Donald Trump has requested the Supreme Court rule on whether a former president is “absolutely immune” from federal prosecution...
...The Supreme Court set oral arguments in the case for the week of April 22, with a decision expected by the end of its term, which usually concludes in late June....
...But the Supreme Court denied that request, and the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia took up the case, unanimously ruling against Trump....
...At the request of Trump’s legal team, the court agreed to expedite his appeal against a ruling of the Colorado Supreme Court that struck him off the state’s primary ballot....
...In practice the Roberts Supreme Court is both player and umpire. Two recent Supreme Court decisions could shape the course of US history....
...to hold office because he had engaged in efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election....
...The US Supreme Court has agreed to take up an appeal from Donald Trump asking whether a US president is immune from criminal prosecution for acts committed in office, a move that will resolve a core issue...
...That could delay a trial currently scheduled for March in the case brought by Jack Smith, the US Department of Justice special counsel, accusing Trump of meddling with the results of the 2020 presidential...
...Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing federal cases against Trump, last year sought to fast-track the review of the immunity claim, bypassing the court of appeals....
...“You cannot take somebody out of a race. The voters can take a person out of the race very quickly, but a court shouldn’t be doing that and the Supreme Court saw that very well,” Trump told reporters....
...“It seems even more urgent” for Democrats “who would like to see Biden get one more bite at the apple”, said Barbara Perry, Supreme Court and presidency scholar at the University of Virginia....
...Whichever way the Supreme Court decides, two things should be kept front of mind....
...The court’s move will put the spotlight on its nine justices, three of whom were appointed by the former president when he was in office....
...Trump’s lawyers wish the case to be heard by the Supreme Court, although no date has yet been fixed....
...Smith had urged the Supreme Court to take the unusual step of bypassing the DC circuit and grant “immediate review”....
...Jack Smith, the US special counsel overseeing federal criminal prosecutions of Trump, on Monday urged the Supreme Court to grant “immediate review” in order for the case to be decided during its current...
...It will be the first time the Supreme Court addresses how a legal principle originally aimed at keeping Confederates from holding office applies to the eligibility of present-day presidential candidates....
...He secured two highly coveted judicial clerkships — the first with Alex Kozinski, from the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and then William Rehnquist, then chief justice of the US Supreme Court...
...battle over Supreme Court’ US Supreme Court refuses to bend to Trump’s will US Supreme Court and civil rights Landmark US Supreme Court ruling protects LGBT rights at work Behind the unjust agenda of...
...It will be the first time the Supreme Court tackles how the constitutional measure originally crafted to stop Confederates from holding office after the civil war bears on presidential candidates today....
...“While respecting the court’s decision, we believe that the court did not afford appropriate significance to the prosecutorial misconduct of Willis and Wade,” a lawyer representing Trump in Georgia said...
...The Trump campaign said the order was “completely flawed” and that it would “swiftly file” an appeal against it with the US Supreme Court....
...At the centre of the cases is a legal doctrine known as the “Chevron deference”, which stems from a 1984 Supreme Court decision involving the oil major....
International Edition