Hints and tips:
...So what does this transaction tell us about the state of the asset management industry?...
...There’s not much precedent to support the idea that Shina et al can walk away based on a MAC clause: WPP was forced against its will to buy Tempus in 2001, Guy Hands couldn’t scrap a bid for East Surrey...
...Abrahamson et al find evidence that “strategic pricing” (implicit collusion) is as strong as ever in the US IPO market....
...Messrs Cable, Darling et al say they don’t care! They should. Moving key staff (100 or so) plus capital is relatively inexpensive....
...The case, Gallus et al. v....
...$1,400bn of structured assets have to be unwound. At least. Somehow. Over some unknown timeframe. In the most illiquid markets witnessed in modern times. Recommended discourse: JCK et al at Alea....
...The leverage game is over for the foreseeable future and not just because regulators will tell Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley et al to go easy on the debt as a quid pro quo for borrowing from the Federal...
...There can be little doubt that Eden et al will achieve or better the top-of-the-band pricing of $18.50-a-share....
...Today’s WSJ tells the tale of how the Street dealt with Amaranth after the fund had traded its way into a deep hole – much of it consisting of kicking Maounis et al while they were down....
...al?...
International Edition